2nd version of IPL T20 Women’s Challenge Cup
concluded with a new Winner. Here are 6 talking points from the tournament: 3
positive and 3 negative.
Image By- ICC
Image By- ICC |
The IPL T20
Women’s Challenge Cup was introduced in 2018 to increase the popularity of
women’s cricket more in India after Indian female cricket team caught
everyone’s attention at Women’s World Cup 2017. 3 years of the IPL Women’s
Challenge Cup with only 3 teams is also being seen as the dress rehearsal of
the full fledged IPL for Women’s Cricket with greater number of teams, just
like Women’s Big Bash League in Australia.
The most recent season saw
Trailblazers defeating Supernovas, the winner of the last two versions, in the
Final to get hold of the trophy. Here we present a brief close look to this version of the
tournament.
Positives:
Atapattu of Supernovas | Image by- iplt20.com |
1. Batting firepower in top order: Except the 2nd match,
which saw Velocity batting order collapse in the 1st order, top
order of teams has shown some real ball hitting capabilities. Trailblazers with
Mandhana and Dottin in opening; Supernova with Athaptthu and Velocity with Shefali
Verma shown that Women’s cricketers can also get runs with high rate in
powerplays and set the base for a quite big total like 165-175 to even 190. Sri Lankan legend Athapatthu has surely
been the best batswoman of the tournament.
Jhulan, Ecclestone, Rajeshwari| Image By- iplt20.com |
2. Bowling: Normally bowling is more dominant
in Women’s cricket than it is in Men’s cricket. Bowling again caught the eye in
this season of Women’s IPL. Mainly, after stormy starts in powerplays by the
batters, bowlers show great potential, control and calmness to hold back runs.
Group stage matches, mainly the last one between Supernovas and Trailbazers,
seen impressive death bowling, Radha
Yadav defending only 10 runs in the final over. She went on to take 5
wickets in the final, the first ever in the competition, and winning the Player of the Tournament award.
World T20’s no. 1 Sophie Ecclestone,
bowling legend Jhulan Goswami, Jahanara Alam impressed as always along
with Rajeshwari Gayakwad, Ekta Bisht,
Kasparek.
Nattakan Chantham| Image by- iplt20.com |
3. Fielding: Well, sparked the name of Nattakan Chantham right now inside
your brain! Yep, tremendous fielder she is. Not just her, throughout the whole
season, some promising fielding is seen. Some misfields and one or two dropper
catches were also there but boundary fielding and some catches been exceptional
one. This has surely been a very promising sign.
Apart from this, this
season of Women’s IPL witnessed some quality all-round play. Deepti Sharma is obviously been the
leader there. Harleen Deol is the
find of the season for Indian Cricket. Her admirably good all-round play won
her the Rising Star of the Tournament
award. Participation from so called backward countries in Cricket and teams
backing them to get good results is also a huge good sign.
Negatives:
1. Middle order batting:
Biggest failure of the season, truly. Only except the 1st
match when Veda Krishnamurthy, Sushma Verma and Sune Luus won Velocity the
match, middle order of every team has fall apart most of the time. Only Harmanpreet Kaur has shown solidity in
middle order batting times and again. Other than that, sometimes they messed up
a real good start and sometimes failed to show some resistance when team
suffered some early blow. Finishing is been well and truly very poor.
2. Lack of experience and no innings
planning: Ok,
it’s really sad that we are saying this till now. Women’s cricket has moved on
to such distance and there is no lacking in experienced players in each team of
the tournament. But any proper planning
to build an innings, to get to a proper good total has hardly been seen out
there. Senior players must take more
responsibilities and share their
huge experience with the youngsters to groom them. Well, I must admit here,
this doesn’t apply in bowling department every time. In many a times they have
shown they have very proper planning with them, just like Supernovas bowlers bowling wide to Dottin in the final.
3. Lack of adaptability: This is also for batting department
mainly. Be it game situation or pitch
condition, very few batters showed notable adaptability. And whenever the
bowlers have brought in any plan, they showed less creativity to counter that.
Batting mainly has been one way traffic for most of the batters. Biggest
problem comes in, when they again and again failed to counter the slow bowling
strategy of the bowlers. Most of the
wickets being lost due slowness of bowling, still players has gone for shots in
the air knowing that they couldn’t clear the rope, the opted for rough powered
shots rather than placement and timing.
So, what this sums up to is that, bowling is been phenomenal but batting, though coming with lots of
potential and promises, seems to be fragile. Well yep, you can’t be much
harsh on them, as they are playing their
first of matches after more than half an year. But what we can say is that, with a bit of
good brain work and planned cricket, we can see the Women’s IPL becoming as
intriguing as the Men’s IPL. And as the viewership is increasing with high
rate, we are may be very near to
witness the 1st full fledged women’s IPL. So, fingers
crossed.
An Article By: Arpan Purkait
Post a Comment
Please do not enter any spam link in comment box